当前位置: X-MOL 学术Notes and Queries › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
‘Begin+ (to) + Infinitive’: Additional Evidence
Notes and Queries ( IF 0.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-04 , DOI: 10.1093/notesj/gjaa069
Michiko Ogura 1
Affiliation  

In Ogura (1997), I made an investigation on the beginning and development of the begin to construction. Since Old English (OE) onginnan/beginnan denoted the ingressive aspect and the non-prefixed ginnan came to be used as a preterite auxiliary, the establishment of MnE begin should be considered to have undergone a twofold process: the development of ingressive begin and the replacement of ginnan/gan by periphrastic do/did. As the twofold process seemed to have taken place sometime between late Old and early Middle English, this article focuses on Ormulum and Laʒamon’s Brut in order to find the choice of verbs in the ‘begin/gan (to) infinitive’ construction.11

中文翻译:

“开始+(至)+不定式”:附加证据

在Ogura(1997)中,我对开始施工的开始和发展进行了调查。由于古英语(OE)onginnan / beginnan表示的ingressive方面和非前缀ginnan后来被用作过去式辅助,建立跨国公司的开始,应考虑到经历了双重的过程:ingressive的发展开始与通过做/做腹股沟代替金南/甘。由于双重过程似乎发生在中古英语晚期和中古英语早期之间的某个时间,因此本文重点介绍Ormulum和Laʒamon的Brut,以便在“开始/ GAN)不定式” construction.1 1
更新日期:2020-10-04
down
wechat
bug