当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Human Rights Practice › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Interdisciplinarity and Punishment in the Academy: Reflecting upon Researching and Teaching Human Rights in University Settings
Journal of Human Rights Practice ( IF 0.9 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-04 , DOI: 10.1093/jhuman/huaa048
Matthew Evans

Abstract
This article reflects upon the experience of researching and teaching human rights, and related areas, in a number of university settings. It is argued, on the one hand, that interdisciplinarity is necessary, present and considered valuable in academic human rights scholarship. On the other hand, the article argues that disciplinary power is exercised in the academy with the effect of limiting the degree to which interdisciplinary research and teaching can take place in practice. As a consequence, interdisciplinary academics (and students) are punished. Both intellectual horizons and material opportunities are potentially constricted. Reflecting upon this potential, the article considers whether it is practically possible to reduce or avoid the disciplining and punishment of this kind of teaching and research in universities and concludes by making the case for a postdisciplinary reimagining of human rights in the academy.


中文翻译:

学院的跨学科与惩罚:对大学环境中的人权研究与教学的反思

摘要
本文介绍了在许多大学环境中研究和教授人权及相关领域的经验。一方面,有人认为跨学科性在学术人权奖学金中是必要的,存在的并且被认为是有价值的。另一方面,该文章认为,在学院内行使学科权力是为了限制跨学科研究和教学在实践中进行的程度。结果,跨学科的学者(和学生)将受到惩罚。智力视野和物质机会都可能受到限制。反思这种潜力,
更新日期:2021-03-15
down
wechat
bug