Abstract

We argue that permissibility-based solutions to the paradox of supererogation encounter a nested dilemma. Such approaches solve the paradox by distinguishing moral and rational permissions. If they do not also include a bridge condition that relates these two permissions, then they violate a very plausible monotonicity condition. If they do include a bridge condition, then permissibility-based solutions either amount to rational satisficing or they collapse back into the classical account of supererogation and fail to resolve the paradox.

中文翻译：

---

基于许可性的解决方案的两难困境

摘要

我们认为，基于许可性的解决方案可以解决嵌套矛盾。这样的方法通过区分道德和理性权限来解决悖论。如果它们还不包括关联这两个权限的桥接条件，则它们违反了一个非常合理的单调性条件。如果它们确实包含桥梁条件，则基于许可的解决方案要么等于合理满足，要么就退回到经典的过度劳累说明中，而无法解决悖论。