Abstract

Solidarity with Indigenous land-based struggles, such as the #NoDAPL movement, reminds us that political affiliations cross racial lines, transcending aspects of tribal and national identity and community attachment. But does solidarity operate according to the politics of sameness, as in unwavering support for the political terrain demarcated by social justice struggles, or is there room among its many manifestations for opposition and challenge? The three books that comprise this review essay explore the tensions associated with enacting solidarity as they reflect on the social and cultural possibilities represented by Indigenous justice struggles. Their investments in examining the political stakes of solidarity—in the Oceti Sakowin’s resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline Project, in Afrofuturist and Indigenous speculative fiction that traces the boundary between Black and Indigenous political formations, and in the tensions that exist among American Indian writing from the interwar and pre-civil rights era—help us to understand how Indigenous solidarity is connected to complex histories, settler-colonial relations, and systemic inequalities, as well as the political promise that social justice movements create.

中文翻译：

---

与土著团结一致

摘要

声援#NoDAPL运动等土著人的土地斗争，这提醒我们，政治联系跨越种族界限，超越部落和民族认同以及社区依恋的方面。但是，团结是否按照相同的政治运作，如对由社会正义斗争划定的政治领域的坚定支持，还是在众多表现形式中存在反对和挑战的余地？构成这篇评论文章的三本书探讨了与实行团结相关的紧张关系，因为它们反映了土著司法斗争所代表的社会和文化可能性。他们投资于检查团结的政治利益–在奥西蒂·萨科温（Oceti Sakowin）抵制达科他访问管道项目的过程中，