Most non-consequentialists “let the numbers count” when one can save either a lesser or greater number from equal or similar harm. But they are wary of doing so when one can save either a small number from grave harm or instead a very large number from minor harm. Limited aggregation is an approach that reconciles these two commitments. It is motivated by a powerful idea: our decision whom to save should respect each person who has a claim to our help, including those whom we fail to save. However, it has recently been argued that it is open to decisive objections. I develop a new limitedly aggregative view: Hybrid Balance Relevant Claims. This view is well grounded in the reasons we have to be skeptical of aggregation and resolves all recent challenges by paying careful attention to the rationale for limited aggregation.

中文翻译：

---

汇总、平衡和尊重个人主张

当一个人可以从同等或类似的伤害中拯救更少或更多的数字时，大多数非后果主义者都会“让数字计数”。但是当一个人可以从严重的伤害中拯救一小部分人，或者从轻微的伤害中拯救非常多的人时，他们会谨慎行事。有限聚合是一种调和这两个承诺的方法。它的动机是一个强有力的想法：我们拯救谁的决定应该尊重每个要求我们帮助的人，包括那些我们未能拯救的人。然而，最近有人争辩说，它对决定性的反对意见持开放态度。我开发了一个新的有限聚合视图：混合余额相关索赔. 这种观点有充分的理由，因为我们必须对聚合持怀疑态度，并通过仔细关注有限聚合的基本原理来解决最近的所有挑战。