This paper presents a new manuscript of part of theHistoria Augustafrom Erlangen, which vindicates a more than century-old hypothesis by E. Patzig: that the 1489 Venice edition of the work is textually valuable. On this basis, and building on the recent work of R. Modonutti, I present five new passages that are not printed in modern editions of theHA, six lacunose passages restored, and propose that the lost Murbach manuscript is the source. Armed with this new evidence, I re-examine the question of the great lacuna between theLives of Maximus and Balbinusand theLives of the Two Valerians, showing that it is a codicological — and not authorial — feature.

中文翻译：

---

奥古斯塔历史新光

本文介绍了部分新手稿奥古斯塔历史来自 Erlangen，这证明了 E. Patzig 一个多世纪以来的假设：1489 年威尼斯版的作品在文本上很有价值。在此基础上，并以 R. Modonutti 最近的工作为基础，我介绍了现代版本的《现代版哈，修复了六段不完整的段落，并提出丢失的默巴赫手稿是其来源。有了这些新证据，我重新审视了马克西姆斯和巴尔比努斯的生平和两个缬草的生活，表明它是一个编纂学的——而不是作者的——特征。