Most private international laws do not address cultural property specifically but, instead, apply the general lex rei sitae rule also to artifacts. Legal scholarship has revealed the flaws of the rigid application of the lex rei sitae principle to cultural goods and has proposed alternative connecting factors, such as the lex originis principle, to prevent forum and law shopping in this field. Reacting to the criticisms, some of the more recent private international law codifications have decided on the adoption of specific rules on stolen and illegally exported cultural goods that combine the lex rei sitae and the lex originis rules and provide room for the parties’ autonomy. This article draws the conclusion that these more recent legislative solutions do not necessarily promote legal certainty and predictability with regard to the governing law and are far from being a Holy Grail for the conflict of laws of cultural property, whether on a national level or within the European Union.

中文翻译：

---

寻找文化财产法冲突的圣杯：欧洲国际私法编纂的最新趋势

大多数国际私法并未专门针对文化财产，而是适用于一般物权法规则也对工件。法学研究揭示了法律应用僵化的缺陷物权法文化产品的原则，并提出了替代的连接因素，例如原产地法原则上，防止该领域的论坛和法律购物。作为对这些批评的回应，最近的一些国际私法编纂决定采用针对被盗和非法出口的文化产品的具体规则，这些规则结合了物权法和原产地法规则，并为当事人的自治提供空间。本文得出的结论是，这些较新的立法解决方案并不一定会促进适用法律的法律确定性和可预测性，并且远非解决文化财产法律冲突的圣杯，无论是在国家层面还是在国家层面。欧洲联盟。