当前位置: X-MOL 学术Asian Journal of Law and Society › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Paths to Digital Justice: Judicial Robots, Algorithmic Decision-Making, and Due Process
Asian Journal of Law and Society ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-15 , DOI: 10.1017/als.2020.12
Pedro RUBIM BORGES FORTES

The paths to digital justice focus on the challenges of contemporary digital societies in reaching automated decision-making processes through software, algorithms, and information technology without loss of its human quality and the guarantees of due process. In this context, this article reflects on the possibilities of establishing judicial robots in substitution for human judges, by examining whether artificial intelligence and algorithms may support judicial decision-making independently and without human supervision. The point of departure for this analysis comes from the experience of criminal justice systems with software for judgment of the possibility of recidivism of criminal defendants. Algorithmic decision-making may improve the public good in support of judicial decision-making, but the analysis of current technology and our standards for due process of law recommends caution on the conclusion that robots may replace human judges and satisfy our expectations for explainability and fairness in adjudication.

中文翻译:

数字正义之路:司法机器人、算法决策和正当程序

通往数字正义的道路关注当代数字社会在通过软件、算法和信息技术实现自动化决策过程的挑战,同时又不损失其人的素质和对正当程序的保证。在此背景下,本文通过检验人工智能和算法是否可以在没有人监督的情况下独立支持司法决策,来思考建立司法机器人替代人类法官的可能性。这一分析的出发点来自刑事司法系统的经验,该系统使用软件来判断刑事被告再犯的可能性。算法决策可以改善公共利益以支持司法决策,
更新日期:2020-09-15
down
wechat
bug