The International Court of Justice [ICJ] delivered its Judgment on Jadhav (India v. Pakistan) in 2019, finding Pakistan in breach of its obligations under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, 1963. Thus, Pakistan is under a continuing obligation to provide, through the means of its own choosing, effective review and reconsideration [ERR] of Jadhav's conviction and sentence. This paper comments on the ICJ's Jadhav Judgment and its implications for Pakistan and India. It also evaluates the legal option if India is not satisfied with Pakistan's implementation of the ERR process effectively. In this situation, India can approach the ICJ again. This paper finds that the possibilities of India's request to be admissible before the ICJ under Article 60 of its Statute are relatively higher than the possibilities of its successful adjudication on the merits.

中文翻译：

---

国际法院的贾达夫判决及其在国际法下对巴基斯坦和印度的影响

国际法院 [ICJ] 就Jadhav（印度诉巴基斯坦）2019 年，认定巴基斯坦违反了 1963 年《维也纳领事关系公约》第 36 条规定的义务。因此，巴基斯坦有继续义务通过自己选择的方式对贾达夫的定罪和判决。本文评论了国际法院的贾达夫判决及其对巴基斯坦和印度的影响。如果印度对巴基斯坦有效实施 ERR 程序不满意，它还会评估法律选择。在这种情况下，印度可以再次接近国际法院。本文认为，印度根据其《规约》第60条提出的请求在国际法院被受理的可能性相对高于其案情裁决成功的可能性。