ABSTRACT

This article follows almost chronologically the COVID crisis between March and May 2020 during what is called, at least in Europe, the “first wave”. Each ‘Act’ of our internal and external theatre is therefore a moment with a specific date, with the questions that were then pertinent. These ‘Acts’ were:

1. First was the setting up of remote sessions under health pressures and the recommendations of our psychoanalytic institutions. This change in the frame and its consequences will be presented from various technical points of view, which have ostensibly raised some original metapsychological hypotheses.

2. Then, concerning our profession, its very status as either essential or inessential has been discussed by public authorities, and inevitably by our patients, who will après-coup have to give meaning to our reactions during this crisis.

3. We will next study the effects of remote sessions, particularly from its psychoanalytic ‘economic’ perspective, and as a kind of ‘credit for in-presence’ in the early stages of quarantine.

4. We will then be looking at the hypothesis of a maternal element in the sessions, imperceptible in normal times, but suddenly palpable in the context of the absence of physical bodies.

5. Finally, we will propose developments through workshops as an option in order to find a response to this unexpected event at the global scale.

摘要

这篇文章几乎按时间顺序追踪了2020年3月至2020年5月之间的COVID危机，至少在欧洲，这被称为“第一波”。因此，我们内部和外部剧院的每个“行为”都是具有特定日期的时刻，其后是相关的问题。这些“行为”是：

1. 首先是在健康压力和我们的精神分析机构的建议下建立远程会议。框架的这种变化及其后果将从各种技术角度进行介绍，这些表面上提出了一些原始的超心理学假设。

2. 然后，关于我们的职业，公共当局已经不可避免地讨论了它的本质或非本质地位，我们的患者也不可避免地要讨论这些问题，在这场危机中，政变必须使我们的反应有意义。

3. 接下来，我们将特别从远程分析的心理分析“经济”角度研究远程会议的影响，并将其作为隔离初期的“在场信用”。

4. 然后，我们将在会议中研究母体因素的假说，在正常情况下这是无法察觉的，但是在缺乏身体的情况下突然可以理解。

5. 最后，我们将通过研讨会提出发展建议，以寻求对全球范围内这一意外事件的回应。