当前位置: X-MOL 学术Culture & Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Conflicts, situated inequality and politics of everyday life
Culture & Psychology ( IF 1.168 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-12 , DOI: 10.1177/1354067x21989950
Charlotte Højholt 1 , Maja Røn Larsen 1
Affiliation  

This article discusses theoretical challenges in conceptualising the dialectical relationship between historical conditions and the situated interplay between people in concrete everyday practice. The concept of conflict may help us move beyond tendencies within psychology to separate history and situated practice, structure and activity, and micro- and macroprocesses – and to regard social life as unambiguous or as governed through hegemony. Research on the everyday social life of schools describes societal conflicts about education and how school children deal with unequal conditions when handling the conflictuality of their everyday lives. Analyses of coordination and conflicts between various parties (e.g. children, parents, teachers and psychologists) elucidate connections between intersubjective efforts to make things work in everyday practice and historical struggles related to the school as a social institution. Concepts are required that enable understanding of these processes as historical and political, driven by intersubjectivity related to concrete dilemmas, connected to personal and collaborative conduct of everyday life – processes we term the politics of everyday life. From a social practice perspective, we discuss how to grasp the ways in which people constitute the conditions for each other in a situated interplay in which they deal with common problems and – through these activities – also produce history.



中文翻译:

冲突,不平等和日常生活中的政治

本文讨论了在概念上将历史条件与具体日常实践中人与人之间存在的相互作用之间的辩证关系概念化时的理论挑战。冲突的概念可能会帮助我们超越心理学的趋势,将历史和定位的实践,结构和活动以及微观和宏观过程区分开来,并将社会生活视为明确的或通过霸权统治的。关于学校的日常社交生活的研究描述了关于教育的社会冲突,以及学童在处理日常生活中的矛盾时如何应对不平等的条件。分析各方之间的协调和冲突(例如,孩子,父母,教师和心理学家)阐明了使事物在日常实践中发挥作用的主体间努力与与学校作为社会机构有关的历史斗争之间的联系。需要一些概念,以使这些过程能够被理解为历史过程和政治过程,这些过程是由与具体困境有关的主体间性驱动的,并与日常生活的个人和协作行为相关联–我们称这些过程为日常生活的政治。从社会实践的角度,我们讨论了如何把握人与人之间相互处境的方式,从而解决共同的问题,并通过这些活动创造历史。需要一些概念,以使这些过程成为历史和政治过程,并受到与具体困境相关的主体间性的驱动,并与日常生活的个人和协作行为相关联–我们称这些过程为日常生活的政治过程。从社会实践的角度,我们讨论了如何把握人与人之间相互处境的方式,从而解决共同的问题,并通过这些活动创造历史。需要一些概念,以使这些过程能够被理解为历史过程和政治过程,这些过程是由与具体困境有关的主体间性驱动的,并与日常生活的个人和协作行为相关联–我们称这些过程为日常生活的政治。从社会实践的角度出发,我们讨论了如何把握人们如何在相互影响的共同环境中通过相互互动来构成彼此的条件的方式,并且通过这些活动还可以创造历史。

更新日期:2021-03-12
down
wechat
bug