In this paper, I analyze some disagreements about scientific ontology as cases of disagreement between epistemic peers. I maintain that the particularities of these cases are better understood if epistemic peerhood is relativized to a perspective-like index of epistemic goals and values. Taking the debate on the metaphysics of laws of nature as a case study, I explore the limits and possibilities of a trans-perspective assessment of positions regarding scientific ontology.

中文翻译：

---

关于科学本体论的分歧

在本文中，我分析了关于科学本体论的一些分歧，例如在认知同between之间的分歧。我坚持认为，如果将认知同伴关系相对于认知目标和价值观的类似观点的索引，则可以更好地理解这些案例的特殊性。以关于自然法的形而上学的辩论为案例研究，我探索了对科学本体论立场进行跨视角评估的局限性和可能性。