As a matter of fact, few, if any, theists have been expressivists about morality. This is probably because expressivism is thought to have unacceptable theological implications. That is, it is thought to imply (1) that God’s goodness depends on our desire-like states, (2) that God’s goodness is not a real property, (3) that it is not true that God is good, and (4) that God’s moral thoughts have no explanation. I argue that expressivism has no such implications and conclude that expressivism is theologically acceptable.

中文翻译：

---

表现主义神学上可以接受吗？

事实上，很少有（有的话）有神论者是关于道德的表现主义主义者。这可能是因为表达主义被认为具有无法接受的神学含义。也就是说，据认为这意味着（1）上帝的善意取决于我们的欲望状态；（2）上帝的善意不是不动产；（3）上帝的善意是不正确的；以及（4） ）上帝的道德思想没有解释。我认为表现主义没有这样的含义，并得出结论说表现主义在神学上是可以接受的。