This study examines survey data on the views of editors of economics journals on common critiques of the discipline, ethics and editorial practices, and the role of prestige and status in publishing. We utilize an ordered probit model to investigate whether editors or journal characteristics are systematically related to editors’ views, controlling for gender and editorial position. Regression results show that editors from top-ranked journals are less likely to agree with common disciplinary critiques, more likely to support market solutions and less likely to agree with concerns about editorial practices.

中文翻译：

---

批评、伦理、声望和地位：经济学编辑调查

本研究调查了经济学期刊编辑对该学科、道德和编辑实践的共同批评以及声望和地位在出版中的作用的看法的调查数据。我们利用有序概率模型来调查编辑或期刊特征是否系统地与编辑的观点相关，控制性别和编辑职位。回归结果表明，来自顶级期刊的编辑不太可能同意常见的学科批评，更有可能支持市场解决方案，并且不太可能同意对编辑实践的担忧。