The paper is based on the recent Grand Chamber judgment Mihalache v Romania and offers a key to understanding the reason of multiple concurring opinions attached to it. The author provides, in particular, some ideas for a different approach to the ne bis in idem principle in its procedural limb (right not to be “tried” twice), which takes into account its actual and profound ratio of protection of the suspect/accused in criminal proceedings, with the aim of allowing the identification of a clear, unambiguous and widely acknowledged definition of the concept of “final acquittal or conviction” relevant within the scope of Article 4 of Protocol no 7 to the Convention.

该文件是基于大会议厅最近的判决Mihalache诉罗马尼亚案提供的，它为理解附有多项共识的理由提供了关键。作者特别提供了一些想法，以在程序方面（见“不被两次审判”的权利）对同等原则中的罪犯原则采取不同的处理方法，同时考虑到其对嫌疑人/犯罪嫌疑人的保护的实际和深刻的比例。被指控在刑事诉讼中，目的是确定《公约》第7号议定书第4条范围内有关“最终无罪释放或定罪”概念的明确，明确和公认的定义。