This review discusses Vincent Blok’s book Heidegger’s Concept of Philosophical Method. Blok’s daring and important argument is that Heidegger has been misunderstood by contemporary philosophers who dismiss his thinking as correlationism; but that at the same time there lies something at the core of Heidegger’s thinking that prevents it from unleashing its true innovative potential; namely a logic of unity. To move beyond this logic of unity, Blok aims to rediscover and redefine the potential of Heidegger’s philosophical method by characterising it along the lines of interrogative intention and creativity of world-interest. This move allows Blok to think about Earth in the age of global warming in a way that was not possible in Heidegger’s work, providing a positive concept of the Earth’s materiality as uncorrelated being that guides the way to a future environmental ethics. The review discusses the main contributions of the book, and also three criticisms, which concern the justification of choices for certain perspectives, the unfulfilled promise of moving from philosophical theory to more practically oriented guidance, and unclarities concerning the alternative that Blok puts forward as an answer to his criticism of Heidegger’s method.

中文翻译：

---

文森特布洛克：海德格尔的哲学方法概念：全球变暖时代的哲学创新

这篇评论讨论了文森特·布洛克的书海德格尔的哲学方法概念。布洛克大胆而重要的论点是，海德格尔被当代哲学家误解，他们将他的思想视为相关主义；但与此同时，海德格尔思想的核心部分阻碍了它发挥真正的创新潜力；即统一的逻辑。为了超越这种统一的逻辑，布洛克的目标是重新发现和重新定义海德格尔哲学方法的潜力，通过沿着质疑意图和世界利益的创造力来表征它。这一举措让布洛克能够以海德格尔作品中不可能的方式思考全球变暖时代的地球，提供地球物质性的积极概念，作为不相关的存在，指导未来环境伦理的道路。该评论讨论了该书的主要贡献，以及三个批评，它们涉及某些观点选择的正当性、从哲学理论转向更实际导向的指导的未实现的承诺，以及关于 Blok 提出的替代方案的不明确性。回答他对海德格尔方法的批评。