This paper clarifies and reflects on the four values that Serene Khader argues feminism can do without in Decolonizing Universalism: independence individualism, personhood individualism, Enlightenment freedom, and gender-role eliminativism. Persuaded by her condemnation of the view Khader calls “headship complementarianism” and her defense of a different form of gender complementarianism, the paper leaves the question of gender role eliminativism aside. It starts by presenting some concerns about her treatment of Enlightenment freedom, independence individualism, and personhood individualism. It agrees that Enlightenment freedom and independence individualism have no place in feminism. Contrary to Khader, however, it maintains that personhood individualism is necessarily a feminist value. It then shows why the value of women’s autonomy is more central to non-imperialist feminism than Khader acknowledges. Ultimately, it agrees with Khader that feminism can be both universalist and non-imperialist provided that these qualifications are adopted.

中文翻译：

---

对非帝国主义、女权主义价值观的反思

本文澄清并反思了 Serene Khader 在非殖民化普世主义中认为女权主义可以没有的四个价值观：独立个人主义、人格个人主义、启蒙自由和性别角色消除主义。由于她对 Khader 所说的“领导互补主义”的谴责以及她对不同形式的性别互补主义的辩护，这篇论文将性别角色消除主义的问题搁置一旁。它首先提出了对她对启蒙自由、独立个人主义和人格个人主义的处理的一些担忧。它同意启蒙自由和独立个人主义在女权主义中没有立足之地。然而，与卡德相反，它坚持人格个人主义必然是一种女权主义价值观。然后它说明了为什么女性自治的价值对非帝国主义女权主义来说比 Khader 承认的更重要。最终，