当前位置: X-MOL 学术Metaphilosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Contingency, Historicity, and Integrity
Metaphilosophy Pub Date : 2020-09-23 , DOI: 10.1111/meta.12452
Vincent Colapietro

The author of this paper contends that Kathleen Wallace’s model of the self is a highly original contribution to contemporary thought. He, however, highlights important respects in which Wallace is adumbrating themes highlighted by Justus Buchler’s scattered insights into human selfhood. In addition, the author identifies two possible lines of inquiry rooted in Wallace’s project calling for further pursuit. Questions regarding self‐division, ones importantly bearing upon the topic of autonomy, and also questions regarding the somatic mechanisms, processes, and practices by which embodied selves maintain themselves as cumulative networks are ones that, above all else, he tries to throw into sharp relief through the defining features of Wallace’s network model and to underscore the inherent power of Wallace’s nuanced approach to a highly contested and intricately complex topic.

中文翻译:

偶然性,历史性和完整性

本文的作者认为,凯瑟琳·华莱士的自我模式是对当代思想的高度原创性贡献。但是,他强调了华莱士正在强调的重要方面,这些方面是贾斯德斯·布赫勒(Justus Buchler)对人类自我的分散见解所突出的主题。此外,作者还指出了华莱士项目中可能提出的两个探究路线,需要进一步研究。与自我划分有关的问题(主要与自治性有关),以及与体现自我的自我维持为累积网络的身体机制,过程和实践有关的问题,首先要解决的问题是:
更新日期:2020-09-23
down
wechat
bug