This think piece argues for a novel qualitative methodology that permits social justice researchers, including National Award for Special Educational Needs Coordination students, to highlight the profound affects of exclusionary school practices for parents of children with SEN and/or disabilities (SEND). Such children are proportionately effected by these practices. The piece was prompted by multi‐strand research into ‘off rolling’ (illegal exclusionary practices), in which 53 parents described the process through which their child was removed from roll and their relationship with the school’s SEN coordinator (SENCo). A preview of the latter is given, which suggests that SENCos’ capacity to influence senior leader decision making around exclusion can be limited. A ‘wavelength methodology’ permits the highlighting of moral injury and provokes difficult questions around school policy, discriminatory practices and SENCo efficacy in minimising exclusion of students with SEND.

中文翻译：

---

关于父母的思考，“偏离”和波长方法：SENCos的问题

这篇专题文章提出了一种新颖的定性方法论，该方法论使社会正义研究人员，包括国家特殊教育需要协调奖获得者，能够彰显排他性学校实践对有特殊教育需要和/或残疾的孩子的父母的深远影响（SEND）。这些孩子按比例受到这些习惯的影响。该作品是由对“下岗”（非法排斥行为）的多方研究推动的，其中53名家长描述了他们的孩子从名册中被逐出的过程以及他们与学校的SEN协调员（SENCo）的关系。给出了后者的预览，这表明SENCos影响高级领导者围绕排他性决策的能力可能受到限制。