This paper investigates whether or not cases of in concreto antinomies (ICAs for short, also called indirect antinomies, accidental antinomies, normative conflicts due to the facts, predicaments, or paranomies) can be predicted. I distinguish two main theoretical positions: “Prodetection” argues that we can predict in concreto antinomies; “unpredictability” argues that we cannot predict them.

中文翻译：

---

在具体矛盾，可预测性和立法方面

本文调查是否对案件中concreto二律背反（商品协定的简称，也称为间接二律背反的，偶然的二律背反，由于事实，困境，或paranomies规范冲突）可以预测的。我区分了两个主要的理论立场：“侦查”认为我们可以根据具体对立进行预测；反之亦然。“不可预测性”认为，我们无法预测它们。