In this paper¹ I would like to thank the following people for commenting on (several drafts of) this paper: Julia Jansen, Martin Stokhof, Jelle Bruineberg and Jeroen Stuiver. I would also like to thank the people at the Wittgenstein Archives in Bergen for their input and expertise during my research stay in January 2020, where I did most of the research for this paper. Alois Pichler also provided helpful comments on the translation of MS-107,176. Furthermore, I would like to thank Annabella Meddens from the Noord-Hollands Archief in Haarlem for her help and expertise. Finally, many thanks to the anonymous reviewer for their comments, which helped to improve the paper.
, I give a clarification and interpretation of Wittgenstein’s use of ‘phenomenology’ and of his ‘phenomenological period’. During his phenomenological period (1929–1930), Wittgenstein used the term ‘phenomenology’ in a positive sense for his own work. He later rejected the term, however, by giving ‘phenomenology’ a second, negative sense. Some interpreters suggest that Wittgenstein’s ideas about phenomenology ‘went underground’ as a synonym for grammar.² Thompson (2008, 102).
I investigate this connection between grammar and phenomenology, and sketch the historical context of Wittgenstein’s conception of phenomenology by comparing it with Mach’s earlier and Husserl’s contemporaneous use of the term.

中文翻译：

---

维特根斯坦与现象学

在本文中¹我要感谢以下人员对本文（多份草稿）的评论：Julia Jansen、Martin Stokhof、Jelle Bruineberg 和 Jeroen Stuiver。我还要感谢卑尔根维特根斯坦档案馆的工作人员在 2020 年 1 月的研究期间提供的投入和专业知识，我在那里完成了本文的大部分研究。Alois Pichler 还对 MS-107,176 的翻译提供了有益的评论。此外，我要感谢来自哈勒姆北荷兰省档案馆的 Annabella Meddens 的帮助和专业知识。最后，非常感谢匿名审稿人的意见，这有助于改进论文。
，我对维特根斯坦对“现象学”及其“现象学时期”的使用进行了澄清和解释。在他的现象学时期（1929-1930），维特根斯坦在他自己的工作中积极使用了“现象学”一词。然而，他后来拒绝了这个术语，给“现象学”赋予了第二个负面意义。一些解释者认为维特根斯坦关于现象学的思想“进入地下”作为语法的同义词。²汤普森 ( 2008 , 102)。
我研究了语法和现象学之间的这种联系，并通过将维特根斯坦的现象学概念与马赫早期和胡塞尔同时期对该术语的使用进行比较，勾勒出维特根斯坦现象学概念的历史背景。