It is nowadays standard to distinguish between epistemic and metaphysical analyticity. Metaphysical analyticity has been widely rejected, while epistemic analyticity has been widely endorsed. I argue that we also have good reason to reject epistemic analyticity. I do so by considering all the plausible ways of characterizing epistemic analyticity and of drawing the epistemic analytic–synthetic distinction. I argue that on all of them, the distinction fails to carve at the semantic joints. I conclude that that there is good reason to think that there is no semantic distinction to be drawn between analytic and synthetic sentences.

中文翻译：

---

重新考虑认知分析

如今，区分认知分析和形而上学分析是一种标准。形而上学分析被广泛拒绝，而认知分析被广泛认可。我认为我们也有充分的理由拒绝认知分析。我这样做是通过考虑所有可能的方式来表征认知分析性和绘制认知分析-综合区别的。我认为，在所有这些上，区别都没有刻画在语义关节上。我的结论是，有充分的理由认为分析句和综合句之间没有语义区别。