Criticism of the theology of Karl Rahner is most often made from bases external to his thought. When the ever greater ascendancy of transcendentality in Rahner’s thought is juxtaposed with areas of his theology concretely differentiated by symbol and history, however, internal difficulties arise that jeopardize the coherence and integrality of his work. Following an analysis of the predominant role of transcendentality in Rahner, three particular areas of such internal difficulty are considered: (1) the irreconcilability of the reciprocally constitutive dynamics of the Realsymbol with the fundamentally unidirectional operation of transcendental grace, (2) the disjunction entailed in the experience of grace as conscious yet unreflexive knowledge (Erkenntnis), and (3) the incommensurability of an historically developmental self-communication (Selbstmitteilung) of the economic Trinity with an a priori, always already self-communication (Selbstmitteilung) of God in grace. By rendering transcendentality ever surpassing in its reach, Rahner ultimately exposes other corners of his theology to the point of provoking internal disjunction that his transcendental overextension leaves him unable to resolve.

中文翻译：

---

卡尔拉纳神学的内在困难

对卡尔拉纳神学的批评通常是基于他思想之外的基础。然而，当拉纳思想中超越性的更大优势与他的神学领域并列时，这些领域通过符号和历史具体区分，然而，内部困难就会出现，危及他工作的连贯性和完整性。在分析了Rahner 中超验性的主要作用之后，考虑了这种内部困难的三个特定领域：（1）Realsymbol的相互构成动力学与超验恩典的基本单向操作的不可调和，（2）分离所带来的在恩典作为有意识但不反身的知识的经验中（Erkenntnis)，以及 (3)经济三位一体的历史发展自我交流 ( Selbstmitteilung ) 与先验的、总是已经在恩典中自我交流 ( Selbstmitteilung ) 的上帝的不可通约性。通过渲染超越性的范围，拉纳最终将他的神学的其他角落暴露在引发内部分裂的地步，他的超越性过度扩张使他无法解决。