In R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police the Court of Appeal held the deployment of live automated facial recognition technology (AFR) by the South Wales Police Force (SWP) unlawful on three grounds. It violated the right to respect for private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights because it lacked a suitable basis in law; the Data Protection Impact Assessment carried out under section 64 of the Data Protection Act 2018 was deficient for failing to assess the risks to the rights and freedoms of individuals processed by the system; and SWP failed to fulfil the Public Service Equality Duty imposed by section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 by failing to assess whether or not the software used in the AFR system was biased in relation to sex and race.

中文翻译：

---

自动人脸识别与警方加强监控

在R（关于 Bridges 的申请）诉南威尔士警察局长上诉法院基于三个理由认定南威尔士警察部队 (SWP) 部署实时自动面部识别技术 (AFR) 是非法的。它违反了《欧洲人权公约》第 8 条规定的尊重私人生活的权利，因为它缺乏适当的法律依据；根据 2018 年数据保护法第 64 条进行的数据保护影响评估存在缺陷，因为未能评估系统处理的个人权利和自由的风险；SWP 未能评估 AFR 系统中使用的软件是否在性别和种族方面存在偏见，因此未能履行《2010 年平等法》第 149 条规定的公共服务平等义务。