This review essay of Wolfson’s recent Heidegger and Kabbalah both praises Wolfson for departing from the historicism of his earliest writings on the kabbalistic tradition, and also critiques him for being unable to ground adequately his critique of the kabbalistic tradition’s ethnocentrism. Resolving the tension in this authorial position, stretched between commitment to a particular tradition and the liberalism of much of contemporary academia, entails acknowledging the limitations of scholarship in religious ethics.

中文翻译：

---

奖学金和传统的批判

这篇有关沃尔夫森最近的海德格尔和卡巴拉的评论文章都称赞了沃尔夫森偏离了他最早的关于喀巴教传统的历史主义，也批评了他无法充分地论证对喀巴教传统的民族中心主义。解决这一作者立场上的紧张关系，包括在致力于特定传统和当代许多学术界的自由主义之间，需要承认学术在宗教伦理学上的局限性。