The interior frequently masquerades a resistance to being clean, often demonstrating different levels of hygiene, containment, and control. Yet, it is the‐body‐inside that simultaneously resists and distributes infection within the mineral contexts of the building. Ever since Van Leeuwenhoek's (1993) discovery of a strange microbial world of bacteria and protozoa, societal, bodily, and spatial interpretations of clean have shifted. Evolving levels of cleanliness continually reposition the interior to become progressively more visually hygienic and meticulously super‐clean. While medical need often leads and intensifies infection control, it is personal fastidiousness, compulsion, and media image that shape human attitudes and cultures to grime and dirt. Historically, “homes‐of‐the‐future” reinforce a technologically sanitized prototype, a strain of which persists in the sterility of the ordered “show‐home.” Each avoids the pathogenic realities of the‐body‐inside revealing esthetic traces of the Modernist ideals of clean lines and clean living that recur in contemporary images of minimal occupation. As we move to develop new hyper‐clean and locked‐down pandemic‐proof interiors capable of immunizing and shielding occupants, this paper re‐evaluates what it means to be clean and how the interior helps to resist and mediate these efforts. As concerns over antimicrobial resistance and interior touching increases, our protection from allergy, disease, and contagion are changing. The interior is increasingly playing a critical role in arbitrating biological infection, either through intelligent cleaning systems, infrastructure, or material science. This paper sets out the existing resistance to, and the conditions for, a new clean interior and posits where and what the future might conceive, including the advancement of immunology by reintroducing “dirt” back into interiors (mirroring Edward Jenner's deliberate infection of humans to develop resistance to smallpox) enabling better biological resistant to the outside world.

中文翻译：

---

内部阻力

内部经常伪装成对清洁的抵抗力，经常表现出不同程度的卫生，密封和控制。然而，正是人体内部在建筑物的矿物环境中同时抵抗和传播了感染。自从Van Leeuwenhoek（1993）发现细菌和原生动物的奇怪微生物世界以来，对清洁的社会，身体和空间解释都发生了变化。不断提高的清洁度不断地重新定位内部，使其在视觉上更加卫生，并变得更加精细。尽管医疗需求经常导致并加强感染控制，但个人的挑剔，强迫和媒体形象塑造了人们对污垢和污垢的态度和文化。从历史上看，“未来之屋”强化了经过技术消毒的原型，这种压力持续存在于订购的“ show-home”的无菌性中。每种方法都避免了人体内部的致病性现实，而是揭示了现代主义理想观念的审美痕迹，这些理想观念以现代主义的最低限度占领形象再现。随着我们努力开发能够对乘员进行免疫和屏蔽的新型超洁净和锁定防大流行的内饰，本文重新评估了清洁的含义以及内饰如何抵抗和调解这些努力。关于抗菌素耐药性和内部问题 随着我们开发能够对人员进行免疫和屏蔽的新型超洁净，锁定大流行的内饰，本文重新评估了清洁的含义以及内饰如何抵抗和调解这些努力。关于抗菌素耐药性和内部问题 随着我们努力开发能够对乘员进行免疫和屏蔽的新型超洁净和锁定防大流行的内饰，本文重新评估了清洁的含义以及内饰如何抵抗和调解这些努力。关于抗菌素耐药性和内部问题触手可及的增长，我们对过敏，疾病和传染病的防护正在改变。无论是通过智能清洁系统，基础设施还是材料科学，内部装饰在仲裁生物感染方面都起着越来越重要的作用。本文提出了对新型清洁内饰的现有抵抗力和条件，并提出了未来可能设想的构想和未来构想，包括通过将“污垢”重新引入内饰来提高免疫学水平（将爱德华·詹纳（Edward Jenner）故意感染人类的​​行为反映给人类增强对天花的抵抗力），从而提高对外界的生物抵抗力。