Variations in citation practices have been studied from a wide range of perspectives. Nonetheless, little research has addressed how the interplay between disciplines and research methodologies can affect the formal representation of citations in research articles. This paper, adopting a multi-perspective design, is an attempt to fill this void by analyzing a purposive sample of 180 research article independent introductions from theoretical linguistics and applied linguistics journals, categorized into three research methodologies. Significant differences were found in these practices because of the disciplinary conventions and the research methodologies employed in the articles; however, the epistemological effects underlying research methodologies (i.e., how members of a discourse community perceive knowledge generation and use through knowledge validation and proving) were by far more evident than the disciplinary bearings.

中文翻译：

---

研究文章介绍中的引用实践：学科与研究方法之间的相互作用

引用实践的变化已经从广泛的角度进行了研究。尽管如此，很少有研究涉及学科和研究方法之间的相互作用如何影响研究文章中引用的正式表示。本文采用多视角设计，试图通过分析来自理论语言学和应用语言学期刊的 180 篇独立介绍的研究文章的有目的的样本来填补这一空白，这些研究文章分为三种研究方法。由于文章中采用的学科惯例和研究方法，这些实践存在显着差异；然而，研究方法背后的认识论效应（即，