In 2015, the United Nations General Assembly formally adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, with the scope to shift the world on to a resilient path focused on promoting sustainable development leaving no one behind. Since the adoption of the 2030 Agenda, academic research on the topic has blossomed. However, most academic research has focused on specific topics within the Agenda, with a bias towards the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) settled on it. The aim of this study is to contribute to the comprehension and delimitation of the 2030 Agenda as a field of study. To do so, we draw upon bibliometric techniques to undertake a sound analysis of the academic and thematic basis of the discipline, by analyzing the academic research on the Agenda to date, composed by 656 research papers. The results highlight the transdisciplinary nature of the 2030 Agenda, which has gathered attention from a wide range of disciplines and authors, especially in the sustainability and green sciences. At the same time, it points out some weaknesses in the development of a deeper comprehension of the 2030 Agenda from disciplines such as political and international sciences, which could hinder its governance, efficacy and impact.

中文翻译：

---

2030 年议程学术研究：跨学科研究领域的挑战

2015 年，联合国大会正式通过了 2030 年可持续发展议程，旨在让世界走上一条专注于促进可持续发展的弹性道路，不让任何人掉队。自 2030 年议程通过以来，有关该主题的学术研究蓬勃发展。然而，大多数学术研究都集中在议程中的特定主题上，偏向于以该议程为基础的 17 个可持续发展目标 (SDG)。本研究的目的是帮助理解和界定 2030 年议程作为一个研究领域。为此，我们利用文献计量技术，通过分析迄今为止由 656 篇研究论文组成的议程学术研究，对该学科的学术和主题基础进行了合理的分析。结果突出了 2030 年议程的跨学科性质，它引起了广泛学科和作者的关注，尤其是在可持续性和绿色科学方面。同时，它指出了从政治和国际科学等学科更深入地理解《2030 年议程》方面的一些弱点，这可能会阻碍其治理、效力和影响。