The cultural history of the ‘troublemaker’ (Dieter Thomä) seems to be dominated by male figures. Critically reflecting on this androcentric focus, the article examines the concept of ‘primary rejection’ as a specific form of ‘troublemaking’ through a re‐reading of Sigmund Freud's ‘Dora Case’. Dora's refusal to continue her treatment in Freud's psychoanalytic setting is not yet informed by a critical discourse against patriarchal normativity, but it has created a moment of irritation that leaves her case open to critical interpretation and retrospective framing. Drawing upon Sara Ahmed's analysis of the ‘cultural politics of emotions’ as well as on Judith Butler's concept of ‘passionate attachment’, this reading of Freud's case study reveals Dora's primary rejection as a gesture of detachment from normative, culturally constructed assignments of identity and desire. The troubling effect of this moment is not only evidenced in the rich body of feminist criticism within the psychoanalytic field and beyond that the Dora Case has produced, but is also mirrored in the primary rejections of female troublemakers in the fictional literature and culture of the twentieth century.

中文翻译：

---

DORA和她的姐妹们：女性疑难者和文化分离政治1

“麻烦制造者”（DieterThomä）的文化历史似乎由男性人物主导。通过对这种雄性中心论的批判性反思，本文通过重新阅读西格蒙德·弗洛伊德（Sigmund Freud）的《多拉案》（Dora Case），考察了“主要拒绝”这一特定形式的“麻烦制造”概念。多拉拒绝继续在弗洛伊德的精神分析环境中接受治疗，但尚无反对重男轻女规范性的批评性言论，但这种做法引起了片刻的恼怒，使她的案子容易受到批评性解释和追溯框架的影响。借鉴萨拉·艾哈迈德（Sara Ahmed）对“情感的文化政治”的分析以及朱迪思·巴特勒（Judith Butler）的“热情依恋”的概念，对弗洛伊德的案例研究的解读揭示了多拉的主要拒绝态度，认为这是脱离规范，身份和欲望的文化建构作业。这一时刻的令人不安的影响不仅体现在精神分析领域内的女权主义批评之内，也证明了《多拉案》所产生的后果之外，而且也反映在二十世纪的虚构文学和文化中女性制造麻烦者的主要排斥中。世纪。