Early Heidegger argues that a “homogenous space of nature” can be revealed by stripping away the intelligibility of Dasein's everyday world, a process he calls “deworlding.” Given this, some interpreters have suggested that Heidegger, despite not having worked out the details himself, is also committed to a notion of deworlded time. Such a “natural time” would amount to an endogenous sequentiality in which events are ordered independently of Dasein and the stand it takes on its being. I show that Heidegger was indeed committed to such a temporal realism even though his treatment of these issues is somewhat scattered and pulled in different directions. In the course of my reconstruction, I renew an interpretation of Heidegger that stresses Dasein's thrownness into nature and I answer William Blattner's powerful interpretation of Heidegger as a failed temporal idealist who was unable to derive the sequentiality of ordinary time from Dasein's non-sequential originary temporality. Heidegger did not attempt to derive sequentiality; instead, he understood it as a built-in feature of the natural universe by which Dasein's activities are constrained. World-time turns out to be a co-production of Dasein's non-sequential originary temporality and the endogenous sequentiality of events in nature.

中文翻译：

---

检索海德格尔的时间实在论

早期海德格尔认为，“自然的同质空间”可以通过剥离此在日常世界的可理解性来揭示，他称之为“去世界”的过程。鉴于此，一些解释者认为海德格尔尽管自己没有弄清楚细节，但也致力于去世界化时间的概念。这样的“自然时间”相当于一种内生的顺序性，在这种顺序性中，事件的顺序独立于此在及其存在的立场。我表明海德格尔确实致力于这样一种时间实在论，尽管他对这些问题的处理有些分散并被拉向不同的方向。在我的重构过程中，我更新了对海德格尔的解释，强调此在对自然的投入，我回答威廉布拉特纳 他将海德格尔强有力地解释为一个失败的时间唯心主义者，他无法从此在的非顺序的原始时间性中推导出日常时间的顺序性。海德格尔并没有试图推导出顺序性。相反，他将其理解为限制此在活动的自然宇宙的内在特征。世界时间证明是此在的非连续的原始时间性和自然事件的内生连续性的共同生产。