当前位置: X-MOL 学术European Journal of Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
One more time on the alleged repugnance of Kant's ethics? Schiller's Kallias letters and the entirety of the human being
European Journal of Philosophy ( IF 0.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-08 , DOI: 10.1111/ejop.12605
Antonino Falduto 1
Affiliation  

In this paper, I consider the Kallias Letters in connection with Kant's account of moral action in order to analyse Schiller's characterisation of Kant's conception of constraint as aesthetically repugnant. I show how Schiller treats the difficulties inherent to the dualistic view that human beings consist in irreducibly sensible and rational natures. After elucidating the fundamental distinctions between Kant's and Schiller's views, I argue that, although Schiller's charge of repugnance appears too weak to pose a serious threat to Kant's ethics, it nevertheless indicates a significant problem in Kant's dualistic conception of the human being.

中文翻译:

又一次关于所谓的对康德伦理学的反感?席勒的卡利亚斯书信和整个人类

在本文中,我将卡利亚斯书信与康德对道德行为的描述联系起来,以分析席勒将康德的约束概念描述为美学上令人反感的特征。我将展示席勒如何处理二元论观点所固有的困难,即人类存在于不可简化的感性和理性本性中。在阐明了康德和席勒的观点之间的根本区别之后,我认为,尽管席勒的反感指控似乎太弱,不足以对康德的伦理构成严重威胁,但它仍然表明了康德的二元论人概念中的一个重大问题。
更新日期:2020-10-08
down
wechat
bug