当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Upstander Intervention and Parenting Styles
Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-06 , DOI: 10.1007/s40653-019-00287-9
John Chapin 1 , Alexey Stern 1
Affiliation  

Findings from a survey of children and adolescents (N = 645) documents that students witness and experience a range of abuse at home and at school. Participants freely acknowledged pushing or shoving (46%) and slapping or hitting peers (40%). The study contributes to the literature by focusing on upstanding (active versus passive bystander intervention) and parenting styles. Findings reveal an interesting disconnect between those who say they will intervene when confronted by friends’ or peers’ bullying behaviors and those who actually have intervened. Children and adolescents with authoritarian parents are more likely to say they would intervene to help peers, but when asked if they actually have done so, they are the least likely to follow-through. In contrast, children with authoritative or permissive parents show the opposite pattern: No significant difference in their intent to intervene, but they are more likely to become upstanders, rather than passive bystanders when actually confronted with bullying behavior.

中文翻译:

Upstander 干预和养育方式

一项针对儿童和青少年 (N = 645) 的调查结果表明,学生在家里和学校目睹并经历了一系列虐待。参与者自由地承认推搡或推搡(46%)和拍打或打同伴(40%)。该研究通过关注正直(主动与被动旁观者干预)和养育方式为文献做出贡献。调查结果显示,在面对朋友或同龄人的欺凌行为时表示会进行干预的人与实际干预的人之间存在有趣的脱节。有专制父母的儿童和青少年更有可能说他们会干预以帮助同龄人,但当被问及他们是否真的这样做时,他们最不可能跟进。相反,拥有权威或宽容父母的孩子则表现出相反的模式:
更新日期:2019-09-06
down
wechat
bug