当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Concept and types of order position: Privilege and discrimination in an institutional conception
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour ( IF 1.4 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-09 , DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.12272
Zoltán Farkas 1
Affiliation  

In this paper, I reinterpret the classic concept of order position, as well as privilege and discrimination in the concept and types of order position. In the first part of the paper, I give a short survey of the classic conception of order position, with special regard to Max Weber's concept of social status or order position. In the second part, I define the concept of order position in my conception. Accordingly, order position is the real institutional position of the given individual (or group) as compared to the institutional position that can be occupied by the given individual (or group) in the general social institutional norm system assumed on the basis of the expressed values, especially the deviation between the two positions as related to the interests of the subject. In the third part, I typify order positions from the aspect of whether the institutional norm system that is valid or realized in reality deviates or does not deviate from the assumed general norm system, and if it does, whether it deviates in a direction corresponding or contrary to the interests of the individuals. In this way, I make a distinction between privileged, normativized and degraded order positions.

中文翻译:

秩序地位的概念和类型:制度概念中的特权和歧视

在本文中,我重新诠释了秩序位置的经典概念,以及秩序位置概念和类型中的特权和歧视。在论文的第一部分,我对秩序位置的经典概念进行了简短的概述,特别是马克斯·韦伯的社会地位或秩序位置概念。在第二部分,我在我的概念中定义了订单位置的概念。相应地,秩序地位是特定个人(或群体)相对于特定个人(或群体)在一般社会制度规范体系中可占据的制度地位而言的真实制度地位。 ,尤其是涉及主体利益的两种立场的偏差。在第三部分,我从有效的或在现实中实现的制度规范体系是否偏离或不偏离假定的一般规范体系的角度来表征秩序立场,如果偏离,是否偏离了与利益相关者的利益相对应或相反的方向。个人。通过这种方式,我区分了特权、规范化和降级的秩序位置。
更新日期:2021-03-09
down
wechat
bug