Within the framework of the increasing academic valuation of the use of qualitative methodologies for the study of the well-being of children and adolescents, a systematic review of the available empirical production was developed through the “Qualitative Metasynthesis” methodology. The purpose of the study was to analyze and describe, jointly and integratively, the main common and shared aspects of the available knowledge on the dimensions that, according to the children and adolescent’s understandings, are significant for their well-being. During the second semester of the year 2018, the SCOPUS and Web of Science databases were reviewed, identifying a total of 76 articles of which 13 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed following the methodology of constant comparison, interpretation of results and conceptual reinterpretation proposed by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007). The results brought about the delimitation and description of five categories: “Positive notion of oneself”; “Good treatment and support relations”; “Recognition”; “Significant activities”; and “Contextual aspects”. The obtained results contribute to the systematization of the knowledge about well-being provided from qualitative methodologies, thus contributing to the development of indicators for the study of well-being with information on domains and significant areas for children and adolescents.

在使用定性方法研究儿童和青少年福祉的学术评价不断提高的框架内，通过“定性综合合成”方法对可用的经验生产进行了系统评价。这项研究的目的是共同和综合地分析和描述现有知识的主要共同和共享方面，这些方面在儿童和青少年的理解中对他们的福祉具有重要意义。在2018年下半年期间，对SCOPUS和Web of Science数据库进行了审查，确定了总共76篇文章，其中13篇符合纳入标准，并根据持续比较的方法进行了分析，对结果的解释和概念的重新解释，由Sandelowski和Barroso（2007）提出。结果带来了对五类的界定和描述：“积极的自我概念”；“良好的待遇和支持关系”；“认出”; “重大活动”；和“上下文方面”。获得的结果有助于从定性方法学获得的关于幸福感的知识的系统化，从而有助于开发有关幸福感的指标，其中包括有关儿童和青少年领域和重要领域的信息。