Sociologists have contributed greatly to our understanding of how systems of oppression operate and work together to produce injustice. However, they have paid considerably less theoretical and empirical attention to fatphobia and ableism compared to some other systems of oppression. Worse yet, noncritical sociological research on fat bodies and disabled bodyminds has often contributed to the perpetuation of both. In this critical literature review of articles on disability and body size in the three highest ranking sociology generalist journals and two medical sociology journals over the past 10 years, we illustrate the main consequences when sociologists fail to employ a critical approach to the study of fat bodies and disabled bodyminds, including their use of eugenical logic and language. We conclude by offering suggestions for how sociologists can do better moving forward.

中文翻译：

---

我们必须做得更好：社会学中的无能力症和恐同症

社会学家为我们对压迫系统如何运作和共同产生不公正现象的理解做出了巨大贡献。但是，与某些其他压迫系统相比，他们对恐惧症和能力的关注在理论和经验上少得多。更糟糕的是，对脂肪和残障人士的非批判性社会学研究通常促进了两者的长期存在。在过去10年间对这三本社会学排名最高的综合性期刊和两本医学社会学期刊中有关残疾和体重的文章进行的批判性文献综述中，我们说明了当社会学家未能采用批判性方法研究脂肪体时的主要后果。和残障人士的身体，包括使用优生逻辑和语言。