当前位置: X-MOL 学术Utilities Policy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Using socio-technical analogues as an additional experience horizon for nuclear waste management A comparison of wind farms, fracking, carbon capture and storage (CCS) with a deep-geological nuclear waste disposal (DGD)
Utilities Policy ( IF 4 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-09 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2021.101181
Dörte Themann , Achim Brunnengräber

Energy technologies can be described as socio-technical ensembles, in which social, political, economic and technical dimensions are embedded. Based on this concept as well as other theoretical approaches dealing with the deployment and development of technologies (e.g. the multi-level perspective of Geels (2002)) this contribution investigates the dynamics and interactions that can occur within the socio-technical ensemble of a deep geological disposal (DGD) for high-level radioactive waste (HLRW). We compare socio-technical analogues and relate findings of three energy technologies with large-scale infrastructures to a DGD. The analysis is based on a systematic literature review and aims to gain indirect knowledge for nuclear waste management (NWM) deduced from the dynamics within the socio-technical ensembles of wind farms, fracking and carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). The analysis is based on a systematic literature review along four central dimensions with eight respective criteria e.g. public participation, conflicts, role of science, etc.



中文翻译:

使用社会技术类似物作为核废料管理的其他经验视域将风电场,压裂,碳捕集与封存(CCS)与深部地质核废料处理(DGD)进行比较

能源技术可以描述为一种社会技术综合体,其中融入了社会,政治,经济和技术方面的内容。基于此概念以及其他涉及技术部署和发展的理论方法(例如,Geels(2002)的多层次视角),该研究调查了深层社会技术集成中可能发生的动态和相互作用。高放射性废物(HLRW)的地质处置(DGD)。我们比较了社会技术类似物,并将具有大型基础设施的三种能源技术的发现与DGD相关联。这项分析是基于系统的文献综述,目的是获得由风电场的社会技术组合中的动态推导得出的有关核废料管理(NWM)的间接知识,压裂和二氧化碳捕集与封存(CCS)。分析是基于系统的文献综述,涉及四个主要方面,包括八个方面的标准,例如公众参与,冲突,科学作用等。

更新日期:2021-03-09
down
wechat
bug