当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of the Philosophy of Sport › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Setting the record straight: a defense of vacating wins in response to rules violations
Journal of the Philosophy of Sport ( IF 1.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-07 , DOI: 10.1080/00948705.2021.1895822
Seth Bordner 1 , Chase Wrenn 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

Sometimes, teams or players violate the rules of their leagues or associations. And sometimes, their leagues or associations respond by striking their wins from the official record. Especially in American college sports governed by the NCAA, this practice of vacating results is unpopular and widely decried. It should not be. Vacating wins can be an appropriate response to rules violations in higher-order competitions in the same way that it can be appropriate to call back a scoring play due to a penalty. We outline the conceptual framework that makes sense of when, why, and how it is appropriate to vacate wins.



中文翻译:

澄清事实:为应对违反规则而放弃胜利的辩护

摘要

有时,球队或球员会违反其联赛或协会的规则。有时,他们的联赛或协会的回应是从官方记录中删除他们的胜利。尤其是在由 NCAA 管辖的美国大学体育运动中,这种取消成绩的做法不受欢迎,并受到广泛谴责。不应该。取消胜利可以是对高级别比赛中违反规则的适当回应,就像因点球而召回得分比赛一样。我们概述了概念框架,该框架可以说明何时、为什么以及如何适当地腾出胜利。

更新日期:2021-03-07
down
wechat
bug