Youth temporary mobility occurs for purposes such as volunteering, Erasmus exchanges and linguistic stays. Although it is increasingly common, a large proportion of young adults are not mobile. This study is based on a large-scale survey among young adults in Switzerland. It draws on the concept of motility to analyse the barriers to temporary mobility, where motility may be defined as a set of mobility resources that refer to three dimensions: access (e.g., financial means or time), skills (e.g., languages and self-confidence) and appropriation (e.g., level of interest). A typology places nonmobile young adults on a continuum between ‘stillness’ (no desire to move) and ‘stuckness’ (unable to move) and identifies four groups: ‘the constrained’ and ‘the financially challenged’ are often constrained to a varying extent by their socio-economic background, their educational pathways and their family network. ‘The locally anchored’ and especially ‘the satisfied stayers’ face fewer constraints and draw more on their own agency to be nonmobile.

中文翻译：

---

在停滞与静止之间：为什么年轻人不进行临时活动？

青年临时流动是出于志愿服务、伊拉斯谟交流和语言停留等目的。尽管它越来越普遍，但很大一部分年轻人没有流动性。这项研究基于对瑞士年轻人的大规模调查。它借鉴了流动性的概念来分析临时流动的障碍，其中流动性可以定义为一组流动资源，涉及三个维度：访问（例如，财务手段或时间）、技能（例如，语言和自我）。置信度）和拨款（例如，兴趣水平）。类型学将无法移动的年轻人置于“静止”（不想移动）和“停滞”（无法移动）之间的连续体中，并确定了四组：“受限制者”和“经济困难者”通常在不同程度上受到社会经济背景、教育途径和家庭网络的限制。“本地锚定”，尤其是“满意的留宿者”面临较少的限制，并更多地依靠自己的机构来实现非流动性。