Sentenced offenders who re-offend prior to serving their previously imposed sentence (multiple conviction offenders) are situated between multiple and repeat offenders. This article examines how they should be sentenced based on censure, consequentialist and desert theories. I conclude that these aims cannot be achieved if they are treated as repeat offenders, and neither can the requirement of proportionality. Censure is, similarly, communicated primarily via hard treatment not via sentence pronouncement. I further analyse all continental European penal codes; half of them do not have any provision governing the sentencing of multiple conviction offenders (tacitly treating them as repeat offenders) and only two countries provide detailed sentencing guidance. I conclude by offering recommendations for the principled sentencing of multiple conviction offenders.

在服刑之前（多罪犯）重犯的判刑犯（多罪犯）位于多罪犯和重犯之间。本文研究了基于谴责，结果论和荒漠理论的应如何判刑。我得出的结论是，如果将这些目标当作屡犯，就无法实现，而对比例性的要求也不能实现。类似地，主要通过严格的处理而不是通过句子宣告来传达保证。我将进一步分析所有欧洲大陆刑法；他们中的一半没有任何关于多名定罪犯的量刑的规定（默认将其视为重复犯人），只有两个国家提供了详细的量刑指南。