A new experimental study by Snider et al. [2020 Nature 586 373–7] reported behavior in a high-pressure carbon-sulfur-hydrogen system that has been interpreted by the authors as superconductivity at room temperature. The sudden change of electrical resistance at a critical temperature and the change of the $R$ vs. $T$ behavior with an applied magnetic field point to superconductivity. This is a very exciting study in one of the most important areas of science, hence, it is crucial for the community to investigate these findings and hopefully reproduce these results. In this paper, we present calculations that expand upon the arguments put forth by Hirsch and Marsiglio [arXiv:2010.10307], and offer some speculations about physical mechanisms that might explain the observed data. We show that there are errors in the analysis presented in the experimental paper, and with the correct analysis, the reported $R$ vs. $T$ data significantly deviate from the expected behavior. In particular, the extremely sharp change in resistance at the superconducting transition is not consistent with a strongly type II superconductor.

Snider等人的一项新实验研究。[2020 Nature 586 373–7]报告了在高压碳-硫-氢系统中的行为，作者将其解释为室温下的超导性。临界温度下电阻的突然变化以及电阻的变化$\mathrm{[R}$ 与 $Ť$施加磁场时的行为表明超导性。这是最重要的科学领域中的一项非常令人兴奋的研究，因此，对于社区来说，调查这些发现并希望重现这些结果至关重要。在本文中，我们将根据Hirsch和Marsiglio提出的论点[arXiv：2010.10307]进行计算，并提供一些有关可能解释观测数据的物理机制的推测。我们表明，实验文件中提出的分析存在错误，并且通过正确的分析，报告了$\mathrm{[R}$ 与 $Ť$数据明显偏离预期行为。特别地，在超导转变处的电阻的极其急剧的变化与强II型超导体不一致。