当前位置: X-MOL 学术Int. J. Photoenergy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Effect of Design Parameters on Fresh Water Produced from Triangular Basin and Conventional Basin Solar Still
International Journal of Photoenergy ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2021-03-02 , DOI: 10.1155/2021/6619138
A. Rajendra Prasad 1 , Ravishankar Sathyamurthy 2 , M. Sudhakar 1 , B. Madhu 3 , D. Mageshbabu 3 , A. Muthu Manokar 4 , Ali J. Chamkha 5, 6
Affiliation  

This paper reported the experimental testing of a triangular and conventional basin solar still (TBSS and CBSS). Solar basin and absorber are made of glass and a polyethylene cover, respectively, with an area of 0.25 m2. Square and triangular absorber with the same area of 0.25 m2 with square and triangular glass cover for condensation was fixed. Experimentations were conducted during the month of December 2018, and different natural criteria such as intensity, wind speed, and surrounding ambient temperatures were considered. Also, the modified model was compared to the CBSS on its performance and efficiency characteristics. The experimental results also revealed that the temperature of the water inside the TBSS was higher as compared with that of the CBSS. The daily yield obtained from CBSS and TBSS was found to be 2.7 and 3.2 kg/m2, respectively. Also, the daily efficiency of the TBSS was improved by 11.36% than the CBSS.

中文翻译:

设计参数对三角流域和常规流域太阳蒸馏器产生的淡水的影响。

本文报道了三角形和常规盆式太阳能静止蒸馏器(TBSS和CBSS)的实验测试。太阳能盆和吸收器分别由玻璃和聚乙烯覆盖物制成,面积为0.25 m 2。面积为0.25 m 2的方形和三角形吸收器与方形和三角形的冷凝水玻璃盖固定。在2018年12月进行了实验,并考虑了不同的自然标准,例如强度,风速和周围环境温度。此外,将修改后的模型与CBSS的性能和效率特性进行了比较。实验结果还表明,TBSS内部的水温高于CBSS。发现从CBSS和TBSS获得的日产量分别为2.7和3.2kg / m 2。此外,TBSS的每日效率比CBSS提高了11.36%。
更新日期:2021-03-02
down
wechat
bug