ABSTRACT

Recent critical perspectives on peacebuilding have sought to shed light on experiences so far marginalized by mainstream approaches. In particular, critics have pushed peacebuilding towards radically different ways of thinking about governance, conflict and peace, by engaging with narratives, experiences and knowledge coming from societies perceived as not invested in modernity or liberalism, such as Indigenous communities. Whilst this may force theory to confront questions of human-centrism, colonial erasure, and structural violence, turning to Indigeneity without questioning the impact of liberal peace ‘thinking', might further elicit marginalization and appropriation, and simply ‘save’ liberal peacebuilding through the back door.

摘要

最近关于建设和平的批判观点试图阐明迄今为止被主流方法所边缘化的经验。特别是，批评家通过与叙事，经验和知识相结合，推动建设和平朝着根本不同的方式思考治理，冲突与和平，这些叙事，经验和知识来自被认为没有投资于现代性或自由主义的社会，例如土著社区。尽管这可能迫使理论去面对人类中心主义，殖民主义消灭和结构性暴力的问题，而转向原产地而不质疑自由和平的“思考”的影响，但可能会进一步导致边缘化和挪用，并通过“简单地”拯救自由主义的和平建设。后门。