Purpose

The present investigation was carried out with the assumption that aquatic weed, mostly macrophytes, that is considered as problematic aquatic component can be turned to a money gyrostat through its commercial exploitation that includes composting and pelleting.

Methods

So in present investigation the aquatic problematic macrophytes (APM) were biologically converted to vermicompost and ‘enriched dispersible multipurpose vermipellets’ through vermitechnology.

Results

The ratio (37.5:1) of aquatic problematic weed/macrophytes and pure vermiculture (PVC) for getting higher return (416% for vermipellets and 414% for vermicompost) on investment was standardized. Quality aspects and economic returns from both vermicompost and vermipellets were worked out.

Conclusion

Bioconversion of APM to vermipellets gave more return on per unit investment. The quality (that includes- C/N ratio, weed and disease resistant, nutrient composition and dispersible nature) of the vermipellets were better in comparison to vermicompost. The empirical models for predicting C/N ratio on the basis of quantity of APM for both vermicompost and vermipellets have been developed exclusively.

Graphic Abstract

中文翻译：

---

通过Vermitechnology-堆肥和制粒管理有问题的水生植物

目的

进行本研究的前提是，可以将被认为是有问题的水生成分的水生杂草（主要是大型植物）通过商业化利用包括堆肥和制粒的方法转变为经济型陀螺仪。

方法

因此，在目前的调查中，将水生有问题的大型植物（APM）通过ver虫技术生物转化为ver虫和“富集的可分散多用途ver虫”。

结果

标准化了水生问题杂草/大型水生植物与纯朱ver养殖（PVC）的投资比例（37.5：1），以获得更高的投资回报率（朱砂皮为416％，朱砂皮为414％）。得出了ver虫和pel虫的质量方面和经济效益。

结论

将APM进行生物转化为朱砂可以使单位投资获得更多回报。与ver虫相比，ver虫的质量（包括碳/氮比，杂草和疾病抗性，营养成分和可分散性）更好。专门开发了基于ver粉和ver粉的APM量预测C / N比的经验模型。

图形摘要