当前位置: X-MOL 学术Geochronometria › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Comparison of equivalent doses obtained with various post-IR IRSL dating protocols of K-feldspar
Geochronometria ( IF 0.8 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-29 , DOI: 10.2478/geochr-2020-0010
Junjie Zhang 1 , Sheng-Hua Li 1 , Xulong Wang 2 , Qingzhen Hao 3, 4, 5 , Guiming Hu 1 , Yiwei Chen 6
Affiliation  

Five dating protocols with post-infrared infrared (IR) stimulated luminescence signals (i.e. pIRIR) were performed on the K-feldspar of loess samples. Two of them were the single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol (SAR) with two-step pIRIR stimulation, with the first IR stimulation at 50°C or 200°C and the second at 290°C (pIR50IR290, pIR200IR290). Two of them were the SAR protocols with five-step or six-step IR stimulation at multiple elevated temperatures to 250°C or 300°C (MET-pIRIR250, MET-pIRIR300). The final one was the multiple-aliquot regenerative-dose (MAR) protocol with the MET-pIRIR300 signal, together with a 500°C heat treatment administered before the test dose (‘MAR with heat’). The results show that when the equivalent dose (De) of the sample was less than 500 Gy, all of the protocols gave consistent results; however, when De exceeded 750 Gy, all of the SAR protocols underestimated De. The pIR50IR290 signal had the highest degree of underestimation, while the pIR200IR290, MET-pIRIR250 and MET-pIRIR300 signals had similar De values and similar degrees of underestimation. Possible reasons for the SAR De underestimation are discussed. We suggest that only the ‘MAR with heat’ protocol is suitable for samples with De exceeding 750 Gy.

中文翻译:

用钾长石的各种IR后IRSL测年方案获得的等效剂量的比较

在黄土样品的钾长石上用红外光谱(IR)激发的发光信号(pIRIR)进行了五次测年。其中两个是具有两步pIRIR刺激的单等分再生剂量方案(SAR),第一个IR刺激在50°C或200°C,第二个IR刺激在290°C(pIR 50 IR 290,pIR 200 IR 290)。其中两个是SAR协议,在多个升高到250°C或300°C的温度下(MET-pIRIR 250,MET-pIRIR 300)具有五步或六步IR刺激。最后一个是采用MET-pIRIR 300的多等分再生剂量(MAR)方案信号,以及在测试剂量之前进行的500°C热处理(“ MAR加热”)。结果表明,当样品的当量剂量(D e)小于500 Gy时,所有方案均给出了一致的结果。但是,当D e超过750 Gy时,所有SAR协议都会低估D e。pIR 50 IR 290信号被低估的程度最高,而pIR 200 IR 290,MET-pIRIR 250和MET-pIRIR 300信号具有相似的D e值和相似的低估程度。特区的可能原因讨论了D e低估。我们建议仅“ MAR带热量”方案适用于D e超过750 Gy的样品。
更新日期:2021-03-01
down
wechat
bug