ABSTRACT Émile Durkheim known among other things for his pioneering sociology of criminal law was also a corporatist theorist and can be interpreted as a predecessor for an institutionalist approach that has recently gained popularity in comparative criminal justice. Durkheim suggested an inverse relationship between the intensities of ‘repressive’ regulation and ‘restitutive’ welfare state regulation. Contemporary institutionalist research has arrived at the same conclusion, but the connection between Durkheim’s theory and the empirical observations of modern comparative research has gone largely unnoticed in both legal scholarship and sociology. Correcting this omission might prove useful for substantive theory: Apart from welfare state strength, neo-institutionalist research has also associated lenient criminal law with corporatist political economy and consensus democracy. Durkheim’s political sociology proposes an answer for the interrelationship between these factors. Durkheim considered social corporatism a democratic institution and as such a precondition for a democracy capable of building the collective restitutive regulation that could alleviate society’s reliance on punitive justice as a basis for social cohesion.

中文翻译：

---

福利，社团主义和刑事司法：比较涂尔干和新制度主义者

摘要埃米尔·杜尔克海姆（ÉmileDurkheim）以其开创性的刑法社会学而著称，他还是社团主义理论家，可以解释为制度主义方法的前身，这种方法最近在比较性刑事司法中越来越受欢迎。涂尔干（Durkheim）提出，“压制性”调节强度与“恢复性”福利状态调节强度之间存在反比关系。当代的制度主义研究得出了相同的结论，但是在法律学术和社会学领域，都没有注意到涂尔干理论与现代比较研究的实证研究之间的联系。纠正这一遗漏可能对实质性理论有用：除了福利国家的力量，新制度主义的研究还把宽大的刑法与社团主义政治经济学和共识民主联系起来。涂尔干的政治社会学为这些因素之间的相互关系提出了答案。涂尔干认为社会社团主义是一种民主制度，是民主能够建立集体恢复性规章制度的前提，可以减轻社会对惩罚正义的依赖，以此作为社会凝聚力的基础。