Customs of War on Land’ (Hague, II). Eventually, Crossland’s study demonstrates how persistent and overlapping tensions in the law of armed conflict already influenced its formative period in the nineteenth century. The campaign to control war was oscillating between humanity and military necessity and between humanitarianism and professionalism. The movements were both international and inward-looking, as visions were inspired by internationalism and patriotism. At times, the regulation of war and arbitration also appeared to be competing instruments. Perhaps most fundamentally, any effort to regulate war sooner or later had to justify why war was not to be outlawed as such. It took the commitment, dedication and endurance of many individuals, and a significant number of setbacks had to be accepted before any rules to mitigate the destructive effect of war or to prevent war from being waged at all were laid down, reflecting no more than compromise.

中文翻译：

---

Littératures populaires du droit。Le droit à la portée de tous

陆战习俗”（海牙，II）。最后，克罗斯兰的研究表明，武装冲突法中持续存在和重叠的紧张局势已经影响了 19 世纪的形成时期。控制战争的运动在人道与军事必要性、人道主义与专业主义之间摇摆不定。这些运动既具有国际性又具有内向性，因为愿景受到国际主义和爱国主义的启发。有时，战争和仲裁的规定也似乎是相互竞争的工具。也许最根本的是，任何规范战争的努力迟早都必须证明为什么战争不会因此被取缔。它需要许多人的承诺、奉献和忍耐，