In this commentary, I raise one question and one critical comment about Rietveld’s normative claim that ‘artistic practices afford embedding technologies better in society’ (2019, p. 5). In what exact sense is this the case? It seems that Rietveld offers two interconnected but conceptually distinct answers to this question. The first focuses on art’s habit-breaking possibilities. The second concerns art’s ability to make the lived experiences of the stakeholders potentially affected by a given technology experientially concrete. I will discuss both points, and why I think more needs to be said about them.

中文翻译：

---

创造和嵌入人性化技术：艺术实践可以提供规范性的指导吗？

在这篇评论中，我对里特维尔德（Rietveld）的规范主张提出了一个问题和一个批评性评论，即``艺术实践可以更好地将技术嵌入社会''（2019年，第5页）。在什么情况下，这是什么意思？对于这个问题，Rietveld似乎提供了两个相互联系但概念上截然不同的答案。首先关注艺术打破习惯的可能性。第二个问题涉及艺术使受相关技术影响的利益相关者的真实体验具有体验性的能力。我将讨论这两点，以及为什么我认为需要对它们进行更多讨论。