Abstract Taking three moments of governance – executive, legislative and judicial – this paper explains how forms of anticolonial critique were composed and articulated within the general regime of imperial rule. Through the career of Roger Casement, this paper shows how international human rights could develop out of the administration of empires as they monitored and compared the treatment of their own subjects in other imperial spaces. Casement drew particularly on his Irish heritage to identify the expropriation of direct producers as the basis of colonial rule. For Casement, colonialism was coeval with the destruction of native life. This was a far more systematic critique than was typical in commentary on the evils of colonialism. It finally impelled Casement into open rebellion, giving him one last opportunity – from the dock as a convicted traitor – to make public an anticolonial epistemology that challenged the legitimacy of imperial sovereignty.

中文翻译：

---

累积的错误：罗杰·凯斯门特与帝国治理中的反殖民时期

摘要 本文以治理的三个时刻——行政、立法和司法——解释了反殖民批判的形式是如何在帝国统治的一般制度中构成和表达的。通过罗杰·凯斯门特 (Roger Casement) 的职业生涯，本文展示了国际人权如何从帝国的管理中发展出来，因为他们监控和比较了其他帝国空间对自己臣民的待遇。凯斯门特特别借鉴了他的爱尔兰传统，将直接生产者的征用确定为殖民统治的基础。对于凯斯门特来说，殖民主义与本土生活的毁灭同时发生。与对殖民主义罪恶的评论相比，这是一种更为系统的批判。它最终迫使凯斯门特公开叛乱，