当前位置: X-MOL 学术Reg. Environ. Change › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Do integrated landscape approaches moderate climate impacts on livelihoods? A review of the evidence from agricultural landscapes
Regional Environmental Change ( IF 4.2 ) Pub Date : 2021-02-26 , DOI: 10.1007/s10113-021-01754-6
John M. A. Duncan , Bryan Boruff , Eloise M. Biggs , Billy T. Haworth , Nathan Wales , Eleanor Bruce

Integrated landscape approaches (ILA) are being utilised to address issues at the intersection of rural development, conservation, and increasingly climate change adaptation. We undertook a systematic literature review to assess which facets of ILA provide climate resilience, the quality of the evidence base used to undertake such assessments, and which analytical approaches were used. We reviewed in detail 386 studies. We found 16 peer-reviewed studies presenting 48 cases of ILA-livelihood-climate interactions that analysed the climate moderating effect of ILA. With such a small sample, discerning a reliable signal of climate resilience from ILA or from facets of ILA is challenging. Most studies focused on the plot or farm level as opposed to higher or multiple spatial scales. This is at odds with the holistic notion of ILA which emphasises the multi-scalar nature of landscapes and their constituent human and environmental systems. However, we highlight the potential for combining the results of multiple individual studies that focus on facets of ILA to detect if a signal of ILA driven climate resilience exists. Only one study focused on how multi-stakeholder governance and institutional arrangements affect climate resilience. This omission within the evidence base precludes empirically grounded insights into the mechanisms through which different governance and institutional arrangements within ILA influence climate response capacity.



中文翻译:

综合景观方法对气候对生计的影响是否适中?回顾农业景观的证据

综合景观方法(ILA)正被用于解决农村发展,保护和日益适应气候变化的交叉问题。我们进行了系统的文献综述,以评估ILA​​的哪些方面具有气候适应能力,用于进行此类评估的证据基础的质量以及所使用的分析方法。我们详细审查了386项研究。我们发现16项经同行评审的研究提出了48例ILA-生计-气候相互作用的案例,这些案例分析了ILA的气候调节作用。有了这么少的样本,从ILA或ILA方面识别可靠的气候复原力信号就具有挑战性。大多数研究集中于地块或农场级别,而不是更高或多个空间尺度。这与ILA的整体概念不一致,ILA强调景观及其组成的人类和环境系统的多尺度性质。但是,我们强调了将多个单独研究的结果结合在一起的潜力,这些研究集中在ILA的各个方面,以检测是否存在由ILA驱动的气候复原力的信号。只有一项研究关注于多方利益相关者的治理和机构安排如何影响气候适应力。证据基础中的这一遗漏排除了基于经验的基于洞察力的洞察力,这些洞察力是ILA内部不同治理和制度安排影响气候响应能力的机制的基础。我们强调了将多个单独研究的结果结合在一起的潜力,这些研究集中在ILA的各个方面,以检测是否存在ILA驱动的气候复原力信号。只有一项研究关注于多方利益相关者的治理和机构安排如何影响气候适应力。证据基础中的这一遗漏排除了基于经验的基于洞察力的洞察力,这些洞察力是ILA内部不同治理和制度安排影响气候响应能力的机制的基础。我们强调了将多个单独研究的结果结合在一起的潜力,这些研究集中在ILA的各个方面,以检测是否存在ILA驱动的气候复原力信号。只有一项研究关注于多方利益相关者的治理和机构安排如何影响气候适应力。证据基础中的这一遗漏排除了基于经验的基于洞察力的洞察力,这些洞察力是ILA内部不同治理和制度安排影响气候响应能力的机制的基础。

更新日期:2021-02-26
down
wechat
bug