After explaining why, after dealing with post-modernist confusions about truth in various books and articles from the mid-1990s to, most recently, 2014 (§1), Haack returns to the topic of truth, she begins (§2) with some thoughts about the claim that concern for truth is on the decline, and perhaps at a new low; a claim that, sadly, may well be true. Then (§3) she looks at some of the many forms that carelessness with the truth may take, and shows that, so far from revealing that the concept of truth is seriously problematic or that there is no such thing as objective truth, it simply makes no sense to say that lies, half-truths, etc., are ubiquitous unless there is such a thing as truth, and a legitimate truth-concept. After that, (§4) she argues that, of course, there is such a thing as objective truth, and a robust truth-concept. And finally, (§5) she suggests some ways to fight against the rising tide of unconcern for truth—and gives her answer to the (trick) question in her subtitle.

中文翻译：

---

发布“后真相”：我们到了吗？

在解释了原因之后，在处理了从 1990 年代中期到最近的 2014 年 (§1) 的各种书籍和文章中的后现代主义对真理的混淆之后，哈克回到了真理的话题上，她开始 (§2)关于对真相的关注正在下降，并且可能处于新低的说法的想法；可悲的是，这种说法很可能是真的。然后（第 3 节）她考察了对真理粗心大意可能采取的多种形式中的一些形式，并表明，远未揭示真理的概念存在严重问题或不存在客观真理之类的东西，它只是说谎言、半真半假等无所不在是没有意义的，除非有真理这样的东西，以及一个合法的真理概念。在那之后，（§4）她争辩说，当然，存在客观真理这样的东西，以及一个强大的真理概念。最后，